What happens
I need the prelude in my lobster solution for the MR to be approved
What do you understand or find about that problem
In this case, I can’t find a linter for lobster lang, so I don’t know how to put the prelude
You make any workaround? What did you do?
After searching, I can’t find one
Evidences
http://aardappel.github.io/lobster/README_FIRST.html
I need help with
I need help with a linter, or let me know if I can omit the prelude for this lang
@season-embodiment final correct answer is this:
The Prelude and postlude cannot be omitted, for these cases the prelude must specify at least how the compilation was done, sorry for the inconvenience.
@uneasy-ruler but in this case, the command for compile is the same as the one in the postlude and the output is the result of the challenge, so should I put only the command? or the command and the output (in this case prelude and postlude will be the same)? or what should I do?
for example:
// lobster file.lobster -- DATA.lst
.
.
code
.
.
// lobster file.lobster -- DATA.lst
// result
You could use the compilation line used by the builder.sh file for lobster as your prelude

Then your prelude will be
// lobster --pak file.lobster
Check if lobster has a multiline comment literal, and use it instead.