Getting different outputs from the reviewers

training
,
1

What happens

I’m getting a different output from the reviewer in a Red program. He is getting a “#1.NaN”, while in my machines I’m getting the correct output.

What do you understand or find about that problem

Maybe there is a difference between versions of Red Lang, or installations.

Did you try any workaround? What did you do?

I proved the code with the same data in two different machines with a clean environment and it works as expected in the correct output.

Evidences

Mine (from the laptop, different from the machine where it was built)

image
image1108×464 37.3 KB

The output from the reviewer

image
image1064×885 133 KB

I need help with

I need to know what to do in this case because I don’t find the error. I need to know the versions that the reviewers are working with or the configuration of the language.

2

It is recommended that you use the language version specified in the Nix packages, in this case the version I am using to check the code for you is 0.64.

Regards,

3

So, I think were are using the same version. What would be the problem? Maybe is the log-2 operator?

image
image751×124 7.92 KB

4

Try to modify the code and send a new merge request. It is most likely because of this division by zero.